Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Stovall

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 8, 1935No. 4999PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

This suit is brought under the provisions of Act No. 161 of 1932; plaintiff alleging that wages totaling §150 are due him for labor performed on an oil and gas well located on land leased for oil and gas development in Sabine parish, La., under a verbal agreement with defendants, Cliff Stovall and the Coats Petroleum Corporation, nonresidents of that parish. The lease, well, and equipment, including a drilling rig, were provisionally seized, plaintiff asserting his lien and making oath that, to his belief, the lease and well were about to be abandoned and the equipment sold or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Creech v. DavidLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
  2. State v. BaumanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  3. Young v. ReedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1934

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Guichard Drilling Co. v. Alpine Energy Serv., Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  2. Lor, Inc. v. Martin Exploration Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Fred E. Cooper, Inc. v. FarrLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Sutton-Zwoile Oil Co. v. Barr Petroleum Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. Ogden Oil Co. v. Servco, a Div. of Smith Intern.District Court, M.D. Louisiana · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API