Legal Opinion

Harrison v. Edwards

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 15, 1840PublishedCited by 9 opinions

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the plaintiff as bearer of a promissory note, given by the defendant to Zuriel Waterman or bearer, for fifty dollars and interest, dated November, 12, 1832, payable on the first day of February, 1835. The defendant pleaded non assumpsit, and a note in offset, dated February 7, 1832, given by said Waterman to the defendant, or bearer, for $145,98, payable in the month of August, 1832, with interest. Issues were joined to the court.

Read the full summary

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by the plaintiff as bearer of a promissory note, given by the defendant to Zuriel Waterman or bearer, for fifty dollars and interest, dated November, 12, 1832, payable on the first day of February, 1835. The defendant pleaded non assumpsit, and a note in offset, dated February 7, 1832, given by said Waterman to the defendant, or bearer, for $145,98, payable in the month of August, 1832, with interest. Issues were joined to the court. Upon the trial in the county court, it was admitted that the note, declared upon by the plaintiff, was executed in…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Redeield J.

— Although it does not appear in proof, in this case, at what time the note, now in suit, came into the hands of the plaintiff, the note, passing by delivery, will be presumed to have come to the plaintiff while it was still current, and before its maturity. Under this state of facts, by the rules -of the common law, which obtain in the state of New York, the defence offered cannot prevail. No payment made to the payee of a negotiable promissory note, while the same is not yet overdue, will avail the maker of the note, as against a bona fide…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Deeter v. BurkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  2. Murtey v. AllenSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899
  3. Arthur A. Bishop & Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  4. Resource Holding Corp. v. Schoff's EstateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1933
  5. Taranjit Kaur MAGHU v. Prabhjot SINGH Prabhjot Singh v. Taranjit Kaur MaghuSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API