Legal Opinion

Arthur A. Bishop & Co. v. Thompson

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 7, 1925PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.

This case is here on exceptions to the rulings of the Hartford municipal court in which a trial was had by jury until the close of the evidence, when the action was dismissed by the court on defendant’s motion, as stated below. On plaintiff’s exception to this ruling the case is here. The action is one of contract, brought to recover the amount remaining unpaid on a certain contract noté executed by the defendant and payable to the plaintiff, in terms as follows:

“$60.00 Norwich, Yt., Aug. 27, 1921.

For and in consideration of a contract and agreement entered into this day with me by Arthur A.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  2. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. Old Wayne Mut. Life Assn. of Indianapolis v. McDonoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Blake v. McClungSupreme Court of the United States · 1898

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clark v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1928
  2. R&G Properties, Inc. v. Column Financial, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  3. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1926
  4. Neverett v. TowneSupreme Court of Vermont · 1960
  5. Siwooganock Guaranty Savings Bank v. CushmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API