Legal Opinion
Grasso v. Frattolillo
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 31, 1930PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBan'ks, J.
The jury could reasonably have found the following facts: The plaintiff’s intestate was a guest in a car owned and operated by the defendant. They were proceeding behind two or three other cars which were being operated at a speed of between twenty and twenty-five miles an hour, down a grade upon a highway which was eighteen feet wide, paved with asphalt, with three foot shoulders on either side, and the edges of the paved road being somewhat rough and irregular. The defendant had a clear vision ahead for about half a mile, there were no cars approaching from the opposite direction, and he…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rindge v. HolbrookSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Jordan, Marsh & Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
- State v. CostelloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1849
- State v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Mazziotti v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. RamsundarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- State v. CofoneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.