Legal Opinion

Selph v. Hanover Fire Insurance Co. of New York

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 17, 1944PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, J.:

At the close of all the testimony introduced in the trial of the action of appellant against appellee to collect on an insurance policy the jury was instructed to return a verdict for the latter, the court having entertained the view that such a course was justified because at the time the policy issued (1) ownership of the insured property did not rest in the appellant, (2) liens against it were not accurately disclosed, and (3) .the purchase price was exaggerated.

We will attempt to reconstruct the transaction from our understanding of the evidence, stressing in the order we have…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North River Insurance v. LewisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  2. Scott v. National Reserve Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  3. Standard Auto Insurance v. WestCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
  4. Kiefer v. Girard Fire & Marine Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Canal Insurance Company v. James C. Dougherty, D/B/A East Coast Hatching Egg ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Homer H. Lee, Brook J. Jones and J. Fred Jones, Her Husband, Brook J. Jones and J. Fred Jones, Her Husband v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
  4. Canal Insurance Company v. James C. Dougherty, D/B/A East Coast Hatching Egg ExpressCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API