Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Lee

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 16, 1965No. 21560PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DYER, District Judge:

In this appeal, we are called upon to decide whether an insurer is precluded from rescinding a liability policy for a false and fraudulent representation, material to the risk, knowingly made in an application which was not attached to or made a part of the policy, because of the so-called integration clause and statements contained in the policy. The district court held against the insurer. We disagree and reverse.

Plaintiff State Farm’s complaint for declaratory relief alleged that in his application the insured, defendant Lee, was asked if he had any physical defect and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance Company v. Lee StrudelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
  2. Henry M. Apperson v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Lucille L. FugateCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957
  5. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance v. HoxieSupreme Court of Florida · 1937

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Homer H. Lee, Brook J. Jones and J. Fred Jones, Her Husband, Brook J. Jones and J. Fred Jones, Her Husband v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API