State v. Demone Alexander
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMichael J. Gableman, J.
¶ 1. We are asked to determine whether a defendant must be physically present when a judge holds an in-chambers discussion with a juror during the middle of a trial. We recognize that a defendant has a constitutional right to be present at his trial. Kentucky v. Stincer, 482 U.S. 730, 745 (1987). Whether this right to be present at trial encompasses in-chambers meetings "admits of no categorical 'yes' or 'no' answer. A conference in chambers might well constitute part of the trial depending upon what matters are discussed or passed upon. Likewise, such a conference might not be a part of the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Ilario M.A. ZanninoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. Jeffrey P. LepschWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- Board of Regents - UW System v. Jeffrey S. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Board of Regents - UW System v. Jeffrey S. DeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Grady v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2021
- Maya Elaine Smith v. Jeff AndersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.