Legal Opinion · Dissent

Maya Elaine Smith v. Jeff Anderson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 2017No. 2015AP000079Published

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

¶ 14. (■dissenting). This court seriously errs in dismissing this petition for review as improvidently granted. It errs because the parties and the public need a decision from this court on the important issues the parties presented, briefed, and argued in this court.

*721¶ 15. This dismissal embodies regrettable appellate practice given the circumstances of this case and the court's scanty workload.

f 16. This dismissal has unnecessarily caused these parties and the amicus curiae expense and delay without giving the parties, the amicus, or the public the benefit of a decision on important issues.1

¶…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Martin Rivera-Gomez v. Rafael Adolfo De CastroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance v. American Girl, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of WausauWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Elliott v. DonahueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Wausau Tile, Inc. v. County Concrete Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API