Legal Opinion

Rowley v. Sanns

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1895No. 17,330PublishedCited by 10 opinions

From the Fulton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcCabe, C. J.

The appellants sued the appellees for partition of certain real estate in Fulton county, the complaint being in the ordinary form.

The appellees answered and filed a cross-complaint setting up title in themselves of all the real estate sought to be parted. Upon the issues formed there was a trial by the court resulting in a special finding of the facts *181upon which the court stated conclusions of law favorable to the defendants upon which they had judgment.

The ruling of the court overruling the demurrer to the appellee’s cross-complaint and the conclusions of law are assigned for error. As the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Davidson v. KoehlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Clark v. MiddlesworthIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Weight v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Stilwell v. KnapperIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Leader Publishing Co. v. Grant Trust & Savings Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Brunson v. HenryIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Merchants National Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  4. King v. DowneyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Reville v. DubachSupreme Court of Kansas · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API