Legal Opinion

Bent v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 8, 1932No. 6449PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILBUR, Circuit Judge.

Petitioner is a member of the copartnership of Bent Bros., engaged in the general contracting business, constructing reservoirs, dams, and other similar work. The partnership made its returns to the Commissioner of Infernal Revenue upon what is called the “long term completed contract” basis, by which the profit or loss incurred upon a contracting job covering more than one year was included in the return of income for the taxable year in which the job was completed. This was a consistent practice of the partnership from 1913 to 1923. A deficiency tax for the year 1920…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Lucas v. American Code Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sam W. Emerson Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
  2. Hamilton Industries, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  3. John Duguid & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1967
  4. Daley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  5. Walter L. Berry and Clover G. Berry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API