Legal Opinion

Williams v. Vice Chancellor Marvel

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 2, 1960PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Southerland, Chief Justice:

The suit in the court below concerns a claim of plaintiffs (relators here) to be reimbursed for water claimed to have been withdrawn from and under their lands.

Plaintiffs sought discovery from the defendants. (1) They asked for the production of certain documents; and (2) they took the deposition of the president of one of the defendants. The defendants objected to producing the documents, and, in the course of the deposition, *24also objected to certain questions put to the witness, who refused to answer them on advice of counsel.

The Vice Chancellor sustained the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Bondholders Corporation v. McClinticCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
  2. Pennsylvania R. Co. v. Kirkpatrick, Chief JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1953
  3. Terry v. StullCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1933
  4. Adair v. PennewillSupreme Court of Delaware · 1930

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Williams v. MarvelSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API