Legal Opinion

In re Mark M.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 26, 1990PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINS, Justice.

The mother of Mark M. and Wendy R. appeals directly to this Court, pursuant to 22 M.R.S.A. § 4006, from a judgment in the District Court (Portland, Rogers, J.) terminating her parental rights, and from the denial of her Motion to Strike Default.

We treat the Motion to Strike Default as a motion for a new trial or to alter, amend, or vacate the judgment pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 59. Most v. Most, 477 A.2d 250, 256 n. 2 (Me.1984). The District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion, which alleged no error of law or mistake of fact, nor the existence of any new…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dongo v. BanksSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  2. Most v. MostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  3. Harrington v. Inhabitants of the Town of GarlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. In Re Jeffrey E.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1989
  5. In Re Amanda D.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1988

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Robert S.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
  2. In re Kaylianna C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  3. In re Kaylianna C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  4. In re Kaylianna C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. In re Kaylianna C.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API