Legal Opinion

De Mars v. Slama

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1975No. 8158PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

In 1973, Harold Kirchner died testate, leaving everything to respondent Roberta Kirchner Wright, his ex-wife. Contesting the will, the appellants herein, three nephews and two aunts of decedent, contended NRS 133.115 precluded respondent Wright from taking any property under the will. The district court held NRS 133.115, pertaining to revocation of a will by divorce, had no application to this case. 1 We agree.

In 1961, the deceased married respondent Wright in Montana, where he executed a will leaving all property to her. Following entry of an Arizona divorce decree in 1965, Kirchner…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Ziegner's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Champaign County Bank & Trust Co. v. JutkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  3. In Re the Estate of ArnoldNevada Supreme Court · 1941

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Papen v. PapenSupreme Court of Virginia · 1976
  2. Morse v. AlleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1982
  3. King v. DavidsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API