Legal Opinion

Papen v. Papen

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided April 23, 1976No. Record 750664PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.

This appeal presents the question, of first impression for us, whether a will executed by a married mán was revoked by the provisions of Code § 64.1-59 (Repl. Vol. 1973), 1 enacted after his divorce but before his death.

On August 27, 1940, in Maryland, Herman A. Papen executed his will, in which he devised and bequeathed his entire estate to his wife, Alice Clayton Papen, and appointed her executrix thereunder. Papen was awarded a divorce a vinculo matrimonii from his wife by decree entered by a Maryland court on October 8, 1947. In 1968 Code § 64.1-59 became effective, and in 1972 Papen died…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. FergusonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1937
  2. In Re Ziegner's EstateWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Champaign County Bank & Trust Co. v. JutkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Timberlake v. State-Planters Bank of Commerce & TrustsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
  5. Wilson v. FrancisSupreme Court of Virginia · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Matter of Probate of Will of ReillyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  2. Estate of Joseph E. Ridenour, Deceased, James R. Ridenour v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1994
  3. In re Estate of SharekSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2007
  4. Nichols v. BaerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Estate of Ridenour v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API