Legal Opinion · Concurrence
Henley v. State Farm Mutual AutoMobile Insurance Co.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
Decided December 4, 2015No. 2140560Published
1ConcurrenceMoore, Judge
I concur in the- result. In his order granting the motion for a partial summary judgment filed by Sandra Henley, Judge Tom King found .
“that a third party motorist was the at fault party as a matter of law, and also that [Henley] was not contributorily negligent. The only issues which remain outstanding for the trier of fact are that of causation and damages.”
We do not have a record of the hearing on the motion for a partial summary judgment, but, presumably, Judge King “exam-in[ed] the pleadings and the evidence before [him]” and “interrogated] counsel” in order to “ascertain what material…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pierce v. OrrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- Ford Motor Co. v. NeeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
- Swafford v. NortonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008