Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Henley v. State Farm Mutual AutoMobile Insurance Co.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 4, 2015No. 2140560Published

1ConcurrenceMoore, Judge

I concur in the- result. In his order granting the motion for a partial summary judgment filed by Sandra Henley, Judge Tom King found .

“that a third party motorist was the at fault party as a matter of law, and also that [Henley] was not contributorily negligent. The only issues which remain outstanding for the trier of fact are that of causation and damages.”

We do not have a record of the hearing on the motion for a partial summary judgment, but, presumably, Judge King “exam-in[ed] the pleadings and the evidence before [him]” and “interrogated] counsel” in order to “ascertain what material…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pierce v. OrrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. NeeseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Swafford v. NortonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API