Legal Opinion

Torch v. Windsor Surry Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided December 9, 2019No. 3:17-cv-00918Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON PORTLAND DIVISION ROBERT TORCH and JESUS GOMEZ, Case No. 3:17-cv-00918-AA individually and on behalf of all others OPINION AND ORDER imilacly‘sittated, = a ET ee Plaintiffs, v. WINDSOR SURRY COMPANY, d/b/a WINDSORONE; WINDSOR WILLITS COMPANY, d/b/a WINDSOR MILL; and WINDSOR HOLDING COMPANY, Defendants. AIKEN, District Judge: In this putative products liability class action, defendants Windsor Surry Company, Windsor Willits Company, and Windsor Holding Company (collectively “defendants”) move under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Shroyer v. New Cingular Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  5. Oscar Socop-Gonzalez v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API