Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Dreflak
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided April 7, 1980No. 2-478A134PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Chief Judge.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
On Petition for Rehearing appellant Wife claims the trial judge erred in excluding the liquor store business which the Husband inherited prior to their separation as part of the marital property subject to division, and therefore this case should be returned to the trial court for retrial.
In our decision, handed down August 8, 1979, we recited in the Facts that “the court determined that the liquor store interest was not subject to distribution between the parties but remained his sole and separate property.” We could also have stated that in her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Elkhart v. MiddletonIndiana Supreme Court · 1976
- Kuykendall v. County CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1968
- Atkinson v. WhippleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Wilson v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- D. R. S. v. R. S. H.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Stream Pollution Control Board v. Town of WolcottIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Sedwick v. SedwickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cunningham v. HilesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.