Legal Opinion

Golden Peanut Co. v. Hunt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 19, 1992No. A91A1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge.

This appeal arises from the trial court’s order granting the appellees’ motion for partial summary judgment.

Charles Mason Hunt (Hunt) entered into a contract to sell his 1990 crop year peanuts to the Golden Peanut Company (Golden). Golden supplied the contract form, which states that it is to constitute the complete and exclusive agreement between the parties and that, “No parol evidence shall be relevant to supplement or explain this agreement.” The contract provided for deferred pricing of the peanuts and that if Hunt and Golden could not reach a mutually acceptable price,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Copy Systems of Savannah, Inc. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  2. Reuss v. Time Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  3. Budd Land Company, Ltd. v. K & R Realty CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1981
  4. Hanley v. Southern Trust InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Golden Peanut Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  2. Golden Peanut Co. v. BassSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. Golden Peanut Co. v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  4. TAYLOR GREENWALD, II v. GLYNN COUNTY BOARD OF TAX ASSESSORSCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API