Legal Opinion

Rosencrance v. Kelley

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1914PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Bandolph' County. Assumpsit by J. M. Bosenerance against Lee J. Kelley and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Lynch, Judge:

Plaintiff sues in assumpsit for the recovery of rent due, as he avers, upon a written contract whereby he leased to defendants an engine and boiler for use by them as part of a sawmill to cut timber yito lumber, and of damages for the negligent abuse of both engine and boiler. The rent reserved was 25 cents for each 1000 feet of lumber cut by defendants. According to the contract stated i* the declaration, defendants agreed to return the machinery in good condition, with the proviso that if the engine burst .without fault on their part they were to be absolved from liability…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. Baltimore & O. R. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Philip Carey Manufacturing Co. v. WatsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Applegate v. Wellsburg Banking & Trust Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Gray v. MankinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Rosenthal v. FoxWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Star Piano Co. v. BurgnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Peters v. HajacosWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ciccarello v. Jos. Schlitz Brewing Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API