Legal Opinion

Williams v. Polgar

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 1972No. Docket 12567PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*97Danhof, P. J.

This is a case of first impression in this state. The questions presented are: at what point does the statute of limitations begin to run in the case of a defective abstract of title, and whether the lack of privity with the abstractor bars recovery by a subsequent purchaser of the land.

Plaintiffs Williams purchased certain property from defendants Polgar under a land contract dated August 1, 1959. At the time of purchase defendants Polgar furnished to plaintiffs Williams an abstract of title certified to July 15, 1959 by a predecessor of defendant American Title Insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hillock v. Idaho Title & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dorr v. Massachusetts Title InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  3. Ehmer v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
  4. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co. v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Mallis v. Bankers Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  2. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  3. In re Consumers Power Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
  4. Boyle v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Shotwell v. Transamerica Title InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API