Legal Opinion

Lemen v. Leffringhouse

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 9, 1929No. 28,267PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This case involves an application of the bulk-sales law (R. S. 58-101). The proceeding is an action by a creditor of the seller against him, and garnishment of the purchasers. The garnishees answered, denying liability. Plaintiff joined issues on *502this answer. These issues were tried-by the court, with the aid of the jury, which answered special questions. Judgment was for defendants. Plaintiff has appealed.

The pertinent facts disclosed by the record and found by the jury may be stated as follows: L. W. Leffringhouse was conducting a retail…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Coleman v. CostelloSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Damicus v. KellyNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Garrison v. CarterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API