Adams v. Hunter Engineering Co.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendant Hunter Engineering Company 1 on each of plaintiffs two contract claims. He assigns error to the trial court’s granting of defendant’s motion for directed verdict, to the denial of plaintiffs motion for sanctions against defendant and to the award of attorney fees to defendant as a sanction against plaintiff for failing to admit a matter requested under ORCP 45. We affirm, writing only to address the attorney fees awarded against plaintiff.
Plaintiff is an automotive mechanic who specializes in brakes and wheel alignment. Defendant manufactures…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Friedman v. Prudential Life Insurance Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984
- Smo v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989
- Kitzerow v. ReinhardtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gottenberg v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Watts v. Lane CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- McConnell v. SutherlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Miller v. American Family Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- Bridge City Family Medical Clinic v. Kent & Johnson, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.