Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hussey

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 8, 1982PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

1. The motion should have been granted as to count one. Uncontroverted evidence introduced by the Commonwealth indicated that the former wife of the defendant was married to one Moran. Since there was no evidence that the defendant was married to his former wife at any time during the period for which he was charged with neglecting to support her, the Commonwealth has failed to prove an essential element of the offense charged under G. L. c. 273, § 1.

2. While the evidence as to count two was scant, we think it was sufficient to withstand the defendant’s motion for a required finding of not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wingate v. Emery Air Freight Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. MarinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. TruczinskasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
  4. Commonwealth v. GruttnerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. ProvencherMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wiik v. RathoreMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1986
  2. Azran v. PotterMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1996
  3. COMMONWEALTH v. JAMES LEHAN.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API