Legal Opinion

Azran v. Potter

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided November 27, 1996PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCoven, J.

This is an action on a promissory note. Partial summary judgment for the plaintiff was allowed, an evidentiary hearing for the assessment of damages was held and judgment was entered for the plaintiff. The defendant has appealed two evidentiary rulings.

In 1991, the defendant executed a promissory note for $20,000.00 in favor of the Shore Bank and Trust Co. In 1993, the FDIC assumed the assets of Shore Bank and Trust Co. The plaintiff purchased the defendant’s promissory note from the FDIC in April, 1993, and the defendant defaulted in his payments on the note sometime thereafter.

The sole…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Irwin v. Town of WareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Tosti v. AyikMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Wingate v. Emery Air Freight Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  4. Commonwealth v. PerezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  5. Kelly v. O'NEILMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Davekos v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API