United States v. Hinson

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Defendant-Appellant Kevin Hinson challenges his conviction and sentence for four counts of methamphetamine distribution-related offenses. Hinson argues that the district court committed plain error by admitting evidence discovered during a search of his automobile, by allowing a police detective to introduce hearsay testimony, by admonishing the defendant that he was under oath while he was testifying, and by wrongly calculating the amount of drugs to attribute to Hinson for sentencing purposes.

We exercise jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18…