Legal Opinion

Griffith v. Boll & Branch, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 3, 2020No. 3:19-cv-01551Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 DENA GRIFFITH, Case No.: 19cv1551 JM (LL) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S 10 v. MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER VENUE 11 BOLL & BRANCH, LLC, 12 Defendant. 13 14 15 Defendant Boll & Branch, LLC (“Defendant) moves to dismiss for improper venue, 16 or alternatively, to transfer this action to the District of New Jersey or Central District of 17 California, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. §§ 1404

and 1406. (Doc. No. 21-1.) Plaintiff Dena 18 Griffith (“Plaintiff”) opposes. (Doc. No. 26.) The motion has been fully briefed and the 19…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Ronald M. Costlow and Bonnie F. Costlow v. Larry Weeks, Individually, and as Assistant Attorney General for the State of Alaska, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Globe Newspaper Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
Peterson v. Highland Music, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
Hermine Fujuro Misch, on Behalf of the Estate of Kansiano Misch, as Well as on Behalf of His Dependents and Family v. Zee Enterprises, Inc. Tuna Clippers, Inc. Casamar Guam, Inc. Laura Ann Partnership Adriatic Sea Partnership Lawrence Zuanich Does I Through V, Individuals and Partners Roe Corporations I Through V, Hermine Fujuro Misch, on Behalf of the Estate of Kansiano Misch, as Well as on Behalf of His Dependents and Family v. Zee Enterprises, Inc., and Laura Ann Partnership Lawrence ZuanichCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
Corona Coal Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.