Legal Opinion

Welch v. Terhune

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 28, 2001No. 00-55644; D.C. No. CV-00-1680-TJHPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM2

William W. Welch, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court’s order denying leave to file the action without prepayment of the full filing fee. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and review denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis for abuse of discretion. Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1115 (9th Cir.1998) (per curiam). We affirm.

The district court properly determined that Welch, proceeding pro se, could not prosecute the instant action as a class action. See C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States of America, Richard L. Stradley, Trustee, Etc. v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Minetti v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. (PC) Apodaca v. SegriestDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  2. (PC) Brown v. ShafferDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
  3. (PC) Hill v. CemoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. (PC) McDonald v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  5. (PC) McDonald v. JonesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API