Legal Opinion

State v. Powell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided July 21, 2004No. 03-0161PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STREIT, Justice.

Concerned about a potentially powerful conflict on the part of his court-appointed trial counsel, William Victor Powell repeatedly requested appointment of another attorney on his behalf. The district court and court of appeals ruled Powell’s alleged conflict was too speculative to require substitution. Because the record before us shows the district court knew of a potential conflict into which it did not sufficiently inquire, we remand for a hearing on Powell’s allegations.

I.Facts and Prior Proceedings

After a break-in at a convenience store in Mason City involving two cases…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Mickens v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Michael Lee Smith v. A.L. Lockhart, Director, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  3. Graber v. City of AnkenySupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  4. Hawkeye-Security Insurance Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. State v. HornessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. NewellSupreme Court of Iowa · 2006
  2. In Re the Marriage of SchrinerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
  3. State of Iowa v. Anthony Allen HoeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  4. State v. DoggettSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  5. State v. SmithermanSupreme Court of Iowa · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API