Legal Opinion · Concurrence
State ex rel. Wright v. Campbell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1997No. 71388Published
1ConcurrenceCrandall, Judge
I concur in result. Rule 56.01 governs protective orders in the discovery process and is modeled after Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c). State ex rel. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Missouri v. Anderson, 897 S.W.2d 167, 170 (Mo.App.1995)(hereinaf-ter “Blue Cross ”); Stortz v. Seier, 835 S.W.2d 540, 541 (Mo.App.1992). Accordingly, federal precedent regarding the federal rule is persuasive authority for the construction of Rule 56.01(c). Id
A party seeking protection under Federal Rule 26(c)(7) must show that the information sought is confidential and a specific potential harm could result…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- In Re Remington Arms Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Centurion Industries, Inc. v. Warren SteurerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Micro Technology, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1992
- State ex rel. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.