Legal Opinion

Careau Group v. United Farm Workers

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1991No. 89-55844PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYMER, Circuit Judge:

Appellant Careau Group, d.b.a. Egg City (“Egg City”), a producer and processor of eggs, and appellee United Farm Workers (“UFW”) had a collective bargaining agreement under which UFW represented workers in all aspects of Egg City’s egg production operation. Egg City sued UFW for damages under section 303 of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), 29 U.S.C. § 187, alleging that the union engaged in a secondary boycott in violation of NLRA § 8(b)(4), 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4). The district court dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in a published opinion, Careau…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richard Augustine v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  2. Careau Group v. United Farm Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Patricia B. Farr v. United States of America United Air Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Iris v. Rivera-Flores v. Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Cholakyan v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLCDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
  4. Orff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  5. Sarei v. Rio Tinto PLC.District Court, C.D. California · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API