Legal Opinion

State, in Re Contempt of Frankel

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided June 27, 1972PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

119 N.J. Super. 579 (1972)

293 A.2d 196

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, IN THE MATTER OF THE CONTEMPT OF ESTHER S. FRANKEL, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued June 12, 1972.

Decided June 27, 1972.

Before Judges SULLIVAN, LEONARD and CARTON.

Mr. Leopold Frankel argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Frankel & Frankel, attorneys).

Mr. John A. Brogan, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent (Mr. George F. Kugler, Jr., Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

2Per curiam

Appellant Esther…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Walker v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. CoreyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1971

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  2. In Re Spann ContemptNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API