Legal Opinion
Mount Arbor Nurseries v. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
* Headnotes 1. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 409; 2. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 42; Commerce, 12 C.J., Section 112; 3. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 42; 4. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 858; 5. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 440; 6. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 430; 7. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 404; 8. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 430; 9. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 441; 10. Negligence, 29 Cyc., p. 597; 11. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 441; Trial, 38 Cyc., p. 1602; 12. Carriers, 10 C.J., Section 441; Trial, 38 Cyc., p. 1615; 13. New Trial, 29 Cyc., p. 735. This is an action versus a carrier for damages for…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KirbySupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- New York, Philadelphia & Norfolk Railroad v. Peninsula Produce ExchangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. BeahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Fisher v. the Pullman Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923
- Johnson v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Neal v. Curtis & Co. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Swindell v. J. A. Tobin Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Bunge Corp. v. Valley Line Supply & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1972