Legal Opinion

Shickle, Harrison & Howard Iron Co. v. S. L. Wiley Construction Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1886PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Berrien. (Smith, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff in this action brought suit against the defendants upon a draft drawn at Richmond, Indiana, by *230the S. L. Wiley Construction Company, per S. L. Wiley, president, upon the Niles Water Works, at Niles, Michigan, for $2,499, payable to the order of plaintiff four months after date.

Proper service was had upon the drawee, and service was made upon the S. L. Wiley Construction Company by delivering a copy of the declaration, with notice of entry of rule to appear and plead, etc., to Solon L. Wiley, president of said corporation, at the city of Niles on the twentv-second day of July,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Newell v. Great Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Maxwell v. SpeedMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rush v. Foos Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Life Insurance Co. v. SpratleyTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. United States Graphite Co. v. Pacific Graphite Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1895
  4. Venner v. Denver Union Water Co.Arapahoe County District Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API