Legal Opinion

Balancio v. United States

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 1, 1958Published

1Opinion of the Court

NOONAN, District Judge.

The defendant has moved this court for an order dismissing the amended complaint in this action, on the grounds that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim under the Federal Tort Claims Act 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b). The defendant bases this contention on the ground that the plaintiff’s exclusive remedy lies under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 751 et seq.

The salient facts of this action are as follows. The plaintiff, a civilian seaman, employed by the defendant was injured in the course of his employment. As a result of the injuries he sustained he…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johansen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  2. Schulz v. Standard Accident Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1954
  3. Sarber v. ætna Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. Sasse v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
  5. Fernandez v. GantzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API