Legal Opinion

Highway Paving Co. v. Board of Arbitration of Claims

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 21, 1962No. Appeal, No. 45PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Cohen,

This is an appeal by Highway Paving Company (Highway) from the entry of a judgment in favor of the defendant-appellee, Board of Arbitration of Claims (Board) following the dismissal of appellant’s complaint in mandamus by the court below for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

Adam Eidemiller, Inc., a Pennsylvania corporation, having a contract with the Pennsylvania Department of Highways and the State Highway and Bridge Authority, brought a claim for additional compensation against these agencies before the Board of Arbitration of Claims. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kaufman Construction Co. v. HolcombSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Foley Bros., Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Land Holding Corp. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth ex rel. Hendrickson v. Pennsylvania State Board of ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  2. Armour Rentals, Inc. v. General State AuthorityCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Capinski v. Upper Pottsgrove TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Adam Eidemiller, Inc. v. State Highway & Bridge AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  5. Graybill & Bushong, Inc. v. Board of Finance & RevenueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API