Legal Opinion
Warren v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 2, 2013No. Nos. 12 Civ. 5070(JPO), 12 Civ. 5071(JPO), 12 Civ. 5230(JPO)PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge:
William J. Warren, Laurie Rubin, and David Young-Wolff bring separate actions against John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (“Wiley”) for copyright infringement and related claims. Rubin’s action is also against William Zerter and Hilary Newman (employees of Wiley), and John Does 1-10 (“the Printer Defendants”). Defendants now move to dismiss these actions for failure to state a claim, pursuant to Rules 9(b) and 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1 For the reasons that follow, the motions to dismiss are granted in part and denied in part.
I.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Arista Records, LLC v. Doe 3Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- ATSI Communications, Inc. v. Shaar Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Eternity Global Master Fund Limited v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York and Jpmorgan Chase BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Oden v. Bos. Scientific Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2018
- BWP Media USA Inc. v. Hollywood Fan Sites, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Catalano v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Lefkowitz v. McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Roe v. Bernabei & Wachtel PllcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.