Legal Opinion

Woods v. Carl Karcher Enterprises Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 26, 2005No. 0209-09609; A123470PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.

Plaintiff appeals a judgment in which the trial court denied her request for attorney fees incurred in obtaining an arbitration award for injuries sustained in a slip-and-fall accident. We review that ruling, which was based on the legal conclusion that plaintiff failed to satisfy the notice requirements of ORS 20.080, for errors of law,1 and affirm.

In late September 2000, plaintiff sustained injuries when she slipped and fell at defendant’s Carl’s Jr. restaurant. After the incident, plaintiff took steps to file a claim and was contacted by a representative of defendant’s insurer,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. ToevsOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rodriguez v. the Holland, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Landers v. East Texas Motor Freight Lines, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. McCall v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Woods v. Carl Karcher Enterprises, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API