Legal Opinion

Gray v. Bertrand

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1987No. C-6005PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit for damages based upon two separate charges of misconduct by In-terFirst Bank Nederland. First, the bank is alleged to have paid the proceeds of a multi-party certificate of deposit in violation of the contractual term of endorsement on the certificate. Second, the bank is accused of having denied the existence of an investment account, in effect converting that account. The trial court rendered summary judgment in favor of the defendant bank and its board chairman, Robert Earl Gray, as to both causes of action. The court of appeals reversed that judgment and remanded the case…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Ames v. Great Southern BankTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Bertrand v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Tilotta v. Goodall, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. Maranatha Temple, Inc. v. Enterprise Products Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1995
  3. Knighton v. International Business MacHines Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1993
  4. Goldberg v. United States Shoe Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
  5. Einhorn v. LaChance, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API