Legal Opinion

Klug v. Auditor General

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1916No. Calendar No. 27,563PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Mandamus by William H. Klug against Oramel B. Fuller, auditor general, to require respondent to approve a plat under sections 3350, 3351, 1 Comp. Laws 1915.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

Mandamus is sought to compel the respondent to approve a plat of certain land situated in the township of I-Iamtramck, Wayne county. The petition alleges that the plat was executed in due form, and that the treasurer of the county had attached thereto his certificate to the effect that all taxes for the five years preceding have been paid, and that the township board approved the plat; but, when submitted to the respondent, he declined to approve it, assigning as a reason for his action that it had not been approved by the board of auditors of Wayne county.

The proceedings in question are…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re LambrechtMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People ex rel. Parsons v. Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. City of Detroit v. ChaffeeMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Attorney General ex rel. McKay v. Detroit & Erin Plank Road Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1851
  5. People v. SchoenbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Stutelberg v. Practical Management Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Allen v. StockwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Leonard-Hillger Land Co. v. Wayne County Board of AuditorsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Aikens v. Department of ConservationMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API