Legal Opinion
Stilwell v. Hertz Drivurself Stations, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 21, 1949No. 9710PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs, Leo F. Stilwell and Edward R. Roche, filed their complaint on September 5, 1946, to recover from the defendant, who had been their employer, unpaid overtime compensation, liquidated damages, and attorney fees pursuant to Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 1060, 1069, 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b). Upon the jury verdict for the plaintiffs, a judgment was entered, and following the denial of defendant’s motion for judgment under Rule 50(b), Federal Rulés of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A., or, in the alternative, for a new trial, this…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Hatfried, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal Rev.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1947
- Dexter v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- Fisher v. VolzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- C. Albert Sauter Co., Inc. v. Richard S. Sauter Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Kraus v. Pa Fit II, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.