Legal Opinion

In re Studley

District Court, D. Maine

Decided October 19, 1940No. 21647PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PETERS, District Judge.

On petition of the above-named bankrupt to revise the order of the referee denying discharge. •>

A creditor filed objections to the debtor’s discharge on the ground that he had committed offenses punishable by imprisonment, to wit, that he had knowingly and fraudulently concealed from his trustee property belonging to the estate and that he had made a false oath in a proceeding in bankruptcy. The false oath, as alleged, consisted in making oath to the schedules in which the property referred to was not listed.

The whole matter narrows down to one issue, and that is,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dilworth v. BootheCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1934
  2. Troeder v. LorschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1906
  3. In re RosenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  4. Hanover-Capital Trust Co. v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
  5. In re HowdenDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. MacLeod v. Arcuri (In Re Arcuri)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1990
  2. Everwed Co. v. Ayers (In Re Ayers)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API