Lunnon v. State

In this direct appeal, we affirm Jameel J. Lunnon’s (“Lunnon”) convictions of several drug offenses, but reverse Lunnon’s conviction of using a vehicle for the purpose of keeping a controlled substance. We find that the Superior Court did not err in denying Lunnon’s request for a missing evidence instruction. We also find to be without merit the State’s claim that the requested missing evidence instruction, if given, would have violated Del. Const, art. IV § 19 that prohibits judges from charging juries with respect to matters of fact.

I. Background

Lunnon was charged in the Superior Court with…