Legal Opinion

Wyoming Refining Co. v. Bottjen

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 22, 1985No. 84-182PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice.

This appeal results from the award of worker’s compensation benefits to appellee Clarence A. Bottjen some ten years after exposure to the condition which caused the ailment. Appellant-employer Wyoming Refining Company contests the award, contending appellee’s claim is barred by the statute of limitations. We agree with appellant and reverse.

Appellant raises two issues:

“I. Did the district court err in awarding worker’s compensation benefits since the appellee-employee’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations?
“II. Is revival and reinstatement of the employee’s previously…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Bemis v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Wyoming State Treasurer Ex Rel. Worker's Compensation Division v. BarnesWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Matter of Estate of BoydWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  5. State Ex Rel. Director, Worker's Compensation Division v. TallmanWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Saldana v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Aanenson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Martinez v. City of CheyenneWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Edgcomb v. Lower Valley Power & Light, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Department of Revenue v. Union Pacific RailroadWyoming Supreme Court · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API