Legal Opinion

Clostermann v. Rode

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1948PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBelt, J.

On June 3,1947, plaintiff, as Executor of the estate of John H. Rode, deceased, commenced this action to recover on a promissory note executed by defendants in the sum of $20,000.00, dated December 31, 1929, and due one year after date. The court sustained a demurrer to the complaint on the ground that it affirmatively appeared therefrom that the action had not been commenced within the six-year period provided by statute (§ 1-204, O. C. L. A.). On refusal of the plaintiff further to plead, the action was dismissed. From the judgment of dismissal, the plaintiff appeals.

The sole question is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Western Coal & Mining Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Meridianal Co. v. MoeckOregon Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Koop v. CookOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Investment & Securities Co. v. BuntenWyoming Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Buell v. Deschutes County Municipal Improvement DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. First American Title Insurance Company v. Northwest Title Company LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API