Legal Opinion · Dissent

Davis v. Bank of Illinois

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 23, 1978Published

1DissentHenry, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent.

This is an action in guaranty, wherein the trial judge and the Court of Appeals found the guarantor to be liable. The only issue with which we are concerned is whether the guarantor, an admitted alcoholic, was mentally competent to execute the contract of guarantee.

I

Landcare Corporation was formed as a diversified holding company in 1973 principally by the petitioner, Davis, who became executive vice president, and his friend and business associate, James A. Lewis, who became president. On November 7, 1973, its board of directors authorized the procurement of a loan…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keller v. N. J. Fidelity & Plate Glass InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. S. M. Williamson & Co. v. RagsdaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  3. McFarlane v. LoudenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Jackson City Bank & Trust Co. v. SternburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Bullock v. Power-Heafey Coal Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API