Gonzalez v. City of Schenectady
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1DissentPooler, Circuit Judge
I concur in the majority opinion in its statements of controlling law and its conclusions as to Part I, II,1 and IV. I respectfully dissent however, as to Part III, because I believe that the relevant rule regarding body cavity searches was clearly established, as it was clearly foreshadowed as a federal constitutional right, prior to Gonzalez’s arrest.
I
To determine whether a right was clearly established2 we look to “(1) whether the right in question was defined with ‘reason-áble specificity’; (2) whether the decisional law of the Supreme Court and the applica*164ble circuit court support the…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.