Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gonzalez v. City of Schenectady

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 28, 2013No. 11-5403-cvPublished

1DissentPooler, Circuit Judge

I concur in the majority opinion in its statements of controlling law and its conclusions as to Part I, II,1 and IV. I respectfully dissent however, as to Part III, because I believe that the relevant rule regarding body cavity searches was clearly established, as it was clearly foreshadowed as a federal constitutional right, prior to Gonzalez’s arrest.

I

To determine whether a right was clearly established2 we look to “(1) whether the right in question was defined with ‘reason-áble specificity’; (2) whether the decisional law of the Supreme Court and the applica*164ble circuit court support the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API