Zurich American Insurance v. Frankel Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALAN S. GOLD, District Judge.
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Plaintiff Zurich American Insurance Company’s (“Zurich”) Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 77]. The parties have filed responses, replies, sur-replies, and sur-sur replies. Having reviewed the parties’ arguments and the relevant case law, I conclude that oral argument is not necessary, and that summary judgment should be entered for Zurich.
I.Factual Background
A. Undisputed Facts
In the underlying action, Nicholas C. Pedano and Mary B. Pedano (“the Peda-nos”) purchased a house…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Allen v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Anthony McCormick v. City of Fort Lauderdale, Jonathan Walker, OfficerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Ralph E. Coblentz, as Administrator, D.B.N. Of the Estate of Edward Thomas Coblentz, Deceased v. American Surety Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Petro v. Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2014
- Pratt v. Government Employees Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020