Pinkel v. Domestic Sewing Machine Co.
Illinois Supreme Court
Appear from the Circuit Court of Monroe county; the Hon. Amos Watts, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dickey
This was an action of debt, brought by the Domestic Sewing Machine Company, against Moeslin & Pinkel, upon a penal bond, the penalty of which was $150, executed on the 29th of October, 1874, by the defendants, reciting that Moeslin had become the agent of the plaintiff for the purpose of selling and renting the manufactures of the plaintiff, and obtaining credit from plaintiff for machines and other articles to be consigned from time to time to Moeslin, and the condition of the bond was, that Moeslin would faithfully pay each and every indebtedness or liability incurred by him to the…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Manaster v. KioebgeIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
- Loellke v. GrantAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
- Blizzard v. EpkensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
- Ungar v. FeuerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
- Wells v. TedrickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.