Legal Opinion

Loellke v. Grant

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 30, 1905PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action of debt. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Jersey County; the Hon. Owen P. Thompson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Baume

delivered the opinion of the court.

To the declaration of appellees in an action of debt on an attachment bond, appellants pleaded, first, nil debet; second, non est factum; third, nul tiel record; fourth, a special plea, averring return of property attached; and fifth, a special plea, averring that the merits of the case were not tried in the action in which the bond was given; that the property was returned and that appellees were not entitled to a greater judgment than one cent. The plea of non est factum was withdrawn by appellants and general and special…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mix v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Kilgour v. Drainage CommissionersIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Wanack v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Pinkel v. Domestic Sewing Machine Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Blizzard v. EpkensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Warner v. WendeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  2. Marrone v. EhratAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  3. Ungar v. FeuerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912
  4. Meyer v. MeyerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API