Legal Opinion

Lowery v. May

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 19, 1925No. 1 Div. 341Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

THOMAS, J.

The covenant given expression in the first instrument and that of date February 2, 1920, was not a covenant running with the land. See Patterson v. A. C. L. R. Co., 202 Ala. 589-591, 81 So. 85; Leek v. Meeks, 199 Ala. 89, 74 So. 31; Jebeles & Colias Conf. Co. v. Brown, 147 Ala. 593, 41 So. 626, 11 Ann. Cas. 525; White v. Harrison, 202 Ala. 623, 81 So. 565; Morris & Morris v. Tuskaloosa Mfg. Co., 83 Ala. 565, 3 So. 689. The insertion of the descriptive words as to area was by way of an attempt to define a subdivision of timbered lands with reference to it being cut over.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Tidwell v. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Jasper Land Co. v. Manchester SawmillsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Libby v. WinstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  4. Morris & Morris v. Tuskaloosa Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  5. Patterson v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API